ArticlePLOS global public health2025
Access to healthcare for people with disabilities in Zambia: a qualitative study.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- "But they are hard work": A qualitative study of the perceptions of healthcare workers in providing care to persons with disabilities in Uganda.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Left behind in primary healthcare: A qualitative exploration of healthcare experiences of people with disabilities in Ethiopia.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
People with disabilities globally experience poorer health outcomes than people without disabilities. The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities emphasises that people with disabilities must have equal access to healthcare, yet evidence demonstrates barriers to access across contexts. Research on this topic is limited in Zambia, and this study therefore aimed to generate evidence on access to healthcare for people with disabilities in Zambia. In this qualitative study, we conducted in-depth interviews with 48 participants, including 16 adults with disabilities, 16 caregivers of a child with disabilities, 12 primary healthcare professionals, and four key informants from government and civil society. Participants were recruited from three districts in Lusaka Province (Lusaka, Chongwe and Kafue), the most populated province in Zambia. Participants were purposively sampled to maximise variation by sex, age, impairment type, district and locality (rural, urban, peri-urban). Data collection was completed in August 2022. Key themes were mapped against the Levesque Framework of healthcare access. Participants reported limited information on available services, stigma from community members and healthcare professionals, limited knowledge on disability and a lack of training for healthcare professionals, and challenges with inaccessible health facilities and transport. Some people with disabilities benefited from government schemes, such as the National Health Insurance Scheme, but implementation faced challenges and not all people with disabilities accessed these services. Government action is needed to improve disability-inclusive healthcare in Zambia, alleviating barriers to reduce health disparities. Recommended actions include training for healthcare professionals and improved facility accessibility.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.