ArticleInternational health2025
Enteral nutrition therapy for elderly patients with common-type COVID-19, a retrospective study based on medical records.
Article in International health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Early enteral nutrition may reduce the incidence of refeeding syndrome for patients with severe corona virus disease 2019 and high nutritional risk.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe objective was to investigate the implications of enteral nutrition for elderly patients with common-type coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
methodsData were retrospectively extracted from medical records. Enteral nutritional supplementation was recommended for patients with a nutritional risk score >3. The preferred method was oral administration, and preparations included Ensure and TPF-T. Continuous variables were compared using analysis of two-tailed Student's t-tests or one-way analysis of variance for normally distributed data and the rank sum test for non-normally distributed data. Categorical variables were compared using the χ2 test or Fisher's exact test. Values of p <0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.
resultsThe mortality rate in the whole cohort was 9.54%. A total of 474 patients tested negative and were discharged; among them, 173 patients received enteral nutrition while 301 patients did not. There were significant correlations between mortality and age, serum albumin concentration, prognostic nutritional index, underlying severe disease status and diet condition. In patients with a poor diet, early use of enteral nutrition is associated with faster conversion to a negative polymerase chain reaction test.
conclusionsThe prognosis of elderly patients with common-type COVID-19 was related to their nutritional status. Enteral nutritional supplementation is the preferred method of nutrition because it is the simplest and most widely accepted method for patients. For patients with poor diet conditions, enteral nutritional intervention should be performed early.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.