ArticlePloS one2025
Model interpretability on private-safe oriented student dropout prediction.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- An adaptive multi-scale spatio-temporal graph network for robust MOOC dropout prediction.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Toward transparent intelligence: Explainable stacked ensembles learning for LiDAR point cloud segmentation.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Student dropout is a significant social issue with extensive implications for individuals and society, including reduced employability and economic downturns, which, in turn, drastically influence social sustainable development. Identifying students at high risk of dropping out is a major challenge for sustainable education. While existing machine learning and deep learning models can effectively predict dropout risks, they often rely on real student data, raising ethical concerns and the risk of information leakage. Additionally, the poor interpretability of these models complicates their use in educational management, as it is difficult to justify identifying a student as high-risk based on an opaque model. To address these two issues, we introduced for the first time a modified Preprocessed Kernel Inducing Points data distillation technique (PP-KIPDD), specializing in distilling tabular structured dataset, and innovatively employed the PP-KIPDD to reconstruct new samples that serve as qualified training sets simulating student information distributions, thereby preventing student privacy information leakage, which showed better performance and efficiency compared to traditional data synthesis techniques such as the Conditional Generative Adversarial Networks. Furthermore, we empower the classifiers credibility by enhancing model interpretability utilized SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) values and elucidated the significance of selected features from an educational management perspective. With well-explained features from both quantitative and qualitative aspects, our approach enhances the feasibility and reasonableness of dropout predictions using machine learning techniques. We believe our approach represents a novel end-to-end framework of artificial intelligence application in the field of sustainable education management from the view of decision-makers, as it addresses privacy leakage protection and enhances model credibility for practical management implementations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.