Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40163443›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Effect of perfusion index on oxygen reserve index accuracy in estimating arterial oxygen tension in anesthetized dogs: Data reanalysis.

Francesca Zanusso, Luca Bellini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Francesca ZanussoDepartment of Animal Medicine, Production and Health, University of Padova, Legnaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8946-0454
Luca BelliniDepartment of Animal Medicine, Production and Health, University of Padova, Legnaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7145-6115

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multi-wave CO-oximetry, utilizing the oxygen reserve index (ORi), estimates arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) in mild hyperoxemia, between 100 and 200 mmHg, and concurrently quantifies local perfusion at the measurement site using the perfusion index (PI). This study explores how variations in PI influence the accuracy of ORi in estimating PaO2 in anesthetized dogs. Data from 37 mechanically ventilated dogs were retrospectively reanalyzed using a different approach. ORi and PI values were collected using a CO-oximeter. The data were categorized into four groups based on PI quartiles. In each group, the relationship between ORi and PaO2 was assessed using linear regression analysis, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) investigated the diagnostic performance of ORi in detecting PaO2 >  150 mmHg. Strong relationships between ORi and PaO2 were observed in groups with PI values <  2 (r2 ≥  0.63). The AUROC of ORi for identifying PaO2 > 150 mmHg decreased with PI >  2 compared to lower values (0.76 vs >  0.88). In this study, PI values >  2 negatively impacted ORi's ability to estimate PaO2, likely due to fluctuations in blood flow perfusing the measurement site. The results of this study suggests that consideration of the PI value is essential when titrating oxygen therapy using ORi in anesthetized dogs.

Indexed as

OxygenPerfusion IndexAnesthesiaAnimalsDogsFemaleMaleOximetryRespiration, ArtificialRetrospective StudiesROC CurveOxygen

Identifiers

PMID40163443
PMCPMC11957256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.