ReviewGerodontology2025
Policy Options to Complement the New Canadian Dental Program Enabling High Quality Care for People With Disabilities and Older Adults.
Review in Gerodontology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe newly announced Canadian Dental Care Plan (CDCP) particularly aims to reduce financial barriers to dental care for individuals living below a family income threshold. The Canadian government has also launched an "Oral Health Access Fund" to support projects aiming to address financial barriers to dental care for older adults, those with disabilities and other groups. Evidence from programs implemented elsewhere in the world could inform policy decisions and address such non-financial barriers for older Canadians and those with disabilities.
aimTo identify dental programs and policies in OECD countries focusing on people with disabilities and older people, and to outline how they might be applied to the Canadian context.
methodsThe strategy for this narrative literature review comprised a combination of Medical Subject Headings (MeSh) or their equivalent, title/abstract keywords, truncations, and Boolean operators. Medline (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL and Scopus were used. The searches were limited to English language publications involving programs and policies in all OECD countries. All searches ran from inception to January 25, 2023, with no restrictions on publication time.
resultsThe search identified 129 articles eligible for review. Findings were categorized as (1) interventions at the institutional-level (subdivided into patient-, professional- and community-focused programs) and (2) interventions at the governmental-level (subdivided into universal, population-specific, and community-based programs). Evidence suggests that targeted, integrated coaching or education programs for oral health care are beneficial, especially when programs are constantly evaluated and improved. Programs with a unified network system that integrates various relevant organizational and health domains have demonstrated to be most effective in the improvement of oral health care and overall health. Dental and medical healthcare workers play a crucial role in improving oral health outcomes and need motivation and fair compensation when caring for older people.
conclusionsThere is limited quality evidence supporting approaches to improving oral health care and oral health for older people and those with disabilities. It is important for policymakers and stakeholders to consider programmes from other countries when expanding the CDCP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.