ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2025
3D Tumor Model to Study Immune Cell Infiltration.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Drug discovery in oncology is characterized by high attrition rates in clinical trials. The main reasons are lack of efficacy or unacceptable toxicity. Thus, more predictive preclinical models for drug discovery and development are urgently needed. In the field of immune-oncology, preclinical models are particularly demanding since they have to reflect the complex interplay between tumor cells and immune cells in the human body.The recent years were characterized by vast advancement in 3D in vitro models and organoid techniques. These models mimic the tumor microenvironment more realistically than traditional 2D cell cultures. They can include the main components of the tumor microenvironment, like (primary) tumor cells, immune cells and other stromal cells and allow growth and interaction of the diverse cell types in 3D. Thus, these 3D models provide a physiologically relevant platform for studying the mode of action of (immuno-) oncologic therapeutic drugs. SMAC (second mitochondrial-derived activator of caspases) mimetics, like many other anticancer drugs, can exert their effects on different cell populations within the tumor microenvironment, which can be analyzed by using 3D co-cultures as preclinical models.Fluorescence microscopy is a powerful tool to study biological processes. In live cell imaging, entire cells or subcellular structures can be monitored over time with the help of fluorescent labels.In this chapter, we describe a human 3D co-culture infiltration assay combining tumor cells embedded in a hydrogel and immune cells added on top of the hydrogel. This 3D co-culture is stable for more than 1 week and gives insights into cellular drug responses over time. We used live cell imaging/fluorescence microscopy as the main readout to quantify immune cell infiltration in 3D in response to SMAC mimetic treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40163311What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.