Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40163287›Full record

ArticleThe Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology2025

Heritable virus-induced germline editing in tomato.

Youngbin Oh, Ugrappa Nagalakshmi, Douglas Dahlbeck, Naio Koehler, Myeong-Je Cho, Savithramma P Dinesh-Kumar, Brian J Staskawicz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Virus-induced transgene- and tissue culture-free heritable genome editing in tomato.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. From Lab to Field: CRISPRing Major CultivatedInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Youngbin OhInnovative Genomics Institute, University of California, Berkeley, California, 94720, USA.
Ugrappa NagalakshmiDepartment of Plant Biology and The Genome Center, The College of Biological Sciences, University of California, Davis, California, USA.
Douglas DahlbeckInnovative Genomics Institute, University of California, Berkeley, California, 94720, USA.
Naio KoehlerInnovative Genomics Institute, University of California, Berkeley, California, 94720, USA.
Myeong-Je ChoInnovative Genomics Institute, University of California, Berkeley, California, 94720, USA.
Savithramma P Dinesh-KumarDepartment of Plant Biology and The Genome Center, The College of Biological Sciences, University of California, Davis, California, USA.
Brian J StaskawiczInnovative Genomics Institute, University of California, Berkeley, California, 94720, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9711-3962

Funding

Innovative Genomics InstituteNational Science Foundation ios-2303522National Science Foundation ios-2303523
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here, we report the successful implementation of heritable virus-induced genome editing (VIGE) in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). We generated three transgenic tomato lines expressing Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9 (SpCas9) under the control of Cauliflower mosaic virus 35S (35S), S. lycopersicum ribosomal protein S5A (SlRPS5A), or S. lycopersicum YAO promoters (SlYAO). These three lines were tested for somatic and heritable editing using the tobacco rattle virus (TRV)-based system carrying guide RNAs (gRNAs) fused with mobile RNA sequences. TRV with gRNA targeted to Phytoene desaturase (SlPDS) and Downy mildew resistance 6 (SlDMR6) genes fused to mobile RNA sequences showed significant somatic editing efficiency in all three tomato lines expressing SpCas9. However, the progenies from the SlYAO promoter-driven SpCas9 tomato infected with TRV with gRNA targeted to SlDMR6 fused to the mobile RNA sequence resulted in monoallelic mutations with a frequency of 3%. Optimization of environmental conditions, such as reduced light intensity, significantly increased heritable editing frequencies, from 0% to 86% at the SlPDS and from 3% to 100% at the SlDMR6, including biallelic mutations. These findings underscore the use of appropriate promoters to express Cas nucleases and optimized environmental conditions to enhance heritable genome editing efficiency in tomato using VIGE. Furthermore, our method enables the generation of mutants without additional tissue culture or transformation once a SpCas9-expressing tomato line is established.

Indexed as

Gene EditingPlant VirusesSolanum lycopersicumCaulimovirusCRISPR-Associated Protein 9CRISPR-Cas SystemsOxidoreductasesPlant ProteinsPlants, Genetically ModifiedCRISPR-Associated Protein 9Oxidoreductasesphytoene dehydrogenasePlant Proteinsheritable plant genome editingtobacco rattle virus‐induced genome editingtomatoYAO promoter

Identifiers

PMID40163287
PMCPMC11956848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.