Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40163285›Full record

ArticleMusculoskeletal surgery2025

Modified percutaneous needle aponeurotomy for Dupuytren's disease: case series with functional outcome.

Anil K Bhat, P K Navaneeth, G Mithun Pai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Musculoskeletal surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anil K BhatDepartment of Hand Surgery, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, India.
P K NavaneethDepartment of Hand Surgery, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, India.
G Mithun PaiDepartment of Hand Surgery, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, India. mithun.paig@manipal.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOver the past three decades, percutaneous needle aponeurotomy (PNA) for Dupuytren's disease has become increasingly prevalent and offers numerous potential benefits. However, significant rates of recurrences are observed in literature. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of our technical modifications of percutaneous needle aponeurotomy that significantly separates the cord in the palm and digits, thereby minimizing recurrences.

methodsWe treated 23 consecutive patients with our modified technique. We use a larger-bore needle in the dorsovolar direction which involves a more controlled extensive disruption of the cord under local anesthesia. The mean total passive extension deficit (TPED) and the Dupuytren's contracture-specific Unité rhumatologique desaffections de la main (URAM) scores were calculated at final follow-up.

resultsTwenty-three patients underwent the procedure, involving 28 affected hands and 38 fingers, including 22 ring fingers, 6 little fingers, and 10 middle fingers. The average follow-up period was 22 months, ranging from 12 to 28 months. At presentation, the mean total passive extension deficit TPED was 50°. At the time of the final follow-up, the mean (TPED) was 10°, with a mean percent correction of 83% which was found to be statistically significant. This included 82% correction at the metacarpophalangeal joint and 81% at the proximal interphalangeal joint. Only four experienced recurrences, accounting for 14.2% of the total with a mean TPED of 30°. Lower URAM score indicated a significant short-term functional improvement.

conclusionOur modified PNA technique enhances cord division in the palm and fingers, leading to improved contracture correction and lower recurrence rates. However, further studies with larger cohorts and control groups are needed to validate these findings.

Indexed as

Dupuytren ContractureFasciotomyAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeedlesRecurrenceTreatment OutcomeContractureDupuytrenFasciotomyNeedlePercutaneousRecurrence

Identifiers

PMID40163285
PMCPMC12660314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.