ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2025
Fertility preservation in female cancer patients: assessing awareness, attitudes, concerns, experiences, and the role of counseling in quality of life.
Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Barriers to fertility preservation among cancer patients in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region: a scoping review.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Current status and influencing factors of fertility preservation in pediatric and adolescent patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in China.Reproductive health · 2026Article
- Perceptions and Understanding of Fertility Preservation among Jordanian Muslim Cancer Patients: Sociocultural and Islamic Perspectives.Journal of religion and health · 2026Article
- Fertility preservation counselling in women with cancer: knowledge, preferences, and unmet needs from a cross-sectional survey.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Observational
- An opportunity for fertility preservation in neurosurgical spinal ependymoma patients: a single center review.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCancer poses significant fertility challenges for women of childbearing age, yet the adoption of fertility preservation (FP) measures remains limited. This study aimed to explore patients' understanding, attitudes, concerns, psychological well-being, and factors influencing their decisions regarding FP during treatment.
methodsThis prospective cohort study involved women aged 18 to 42 diagnosed with non-metastatic breast cancer or lymphoma, treated at the American University of Beirut Medical Center. Patients completed questionnaires at intervals over a 2- to 3-year period following diagnosis.
resultsAmong the 123 women studied, 71.5% were married, and 13.5% had no children. Although 87.8% were informed about the fertility risks of their treatment, only 45.4% expressed a desire for FP. Multivariable analysis revealed that parity was significantly associated with fertility concerns (p = 0.019). Decisions favoring FP were significantly influenced by younger age at diagnosis, lower parity, and higher education levels (p = 0.001, p < 0.001, and p = 0.036, respectively). While 56% of patients received FP counseling-mostly from oncologists (83%)-the preference for FP methods varied, with 47% choosing medical approaches and 53% opting for procedural interventions. Despite recognizing the importance of FP, 91% reported that it did not significantly influence their treatment choices. Patients showed greater satisfaction when oncologists discussed fertility-related topics (p < 0.001). Over time, overall FertiQoL scores and DASS-42 scores indicated improved psychological well-being.
conclusionOur study highlights the complexities of FP decisions among cancer survivors, emphasizing the need for proper counseling to support their quality of life and psychological well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.