ArticleEJNMMI physics2025
A digital twin of the Biograph Vision Quadra long axial field of view PET/CT: Monte Carlo simulation and image reconstruction framework.
Article in EJNMMI physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Next Frontier in Quantitative Co-Clinical Imaging to Advance Functional Precision Oncology.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026Article
- Applications of artificial intelligence in nuclear medicine.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2026Review
- Enhanced accuracy of cardiacEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- High-temporal resolution metabolic connectivity resolved by component-based noise correction.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2026Article
- Instrumentation Digital Twins in PET and SPECT Imaging: Current Status, Challenges, and Future Directions.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe high sensitivity and axial coverage of large axial field of view (LAFOV) PET scanners have an unmet potential for total-body PET research. Despite these technological advances, inherent challenges to PET scans such as patient motion persist. To provide simulation-derived ground truth information, we developed a digital replica of the Biograph Vision Quadra LAFOV PET/CT scanner closely mimicking real event processing and image reconstruction. MATERIAL AND
methodsThe framework uses a GATE model in combination with vendor-specific software prototypes for event processing and image reconstruction (e7 tools, Siemens Healthineers). The framework was validated against experimental measurements following the NEMA NU-2 2018 standard. In addition, patient-like simulations were performed with the XCAT phantom, including respiratory motion and modeled lesions of 5, 10, 20 mm size, to assess the impact of motion artefacts on PET images using a motion-free reference.
resultsThe simulation framework demonstrated high accuracy in replicating scanner performance in terms of image quality, contrast recovery (37 mm sphere: 86.5% and 85.5%; 28 mm: 82.6% and 82.4%; 22 mm: 78.8% and 77.7%; 17 mm: 74.9% and 74.6%; 13 mm: 67.0% and 67.9%; 10 mm: 55.5% and 64.3%), image noise (CV of 7.5% and 7.7%) and sensitivity (174.6 cps/kBq and 175.3 cps/kBq) for the simulation and experimental data, respectively. High agreement was found for the spatial resolution with a difference of 0.4 ± 0.3 mm and the NECR aligned well with a maximum deviation of 9%, particularly in the clinical activity range below 10 kBq/mL. Motion induced artefacts resulted in a quantification error at lesion level between - 12.3% and - 45.1%.
conclusionThe experimentally validated digital twin of the Biograph Vision Quadra facilitates detailed studies of realistic patient scenarios while offering unprecedented opportunities for motion correction, dosimetry, AI training, and imaging protocol optimization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.