SynthesisSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025
Sexual dysfunction in women with breast cancer: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Digital Health Interventions and Psychosocial Outcomes in Women With Breast Cancer: Systematic Review.JMIR cancer · 2026Pooled it
- Exploring sexual health and function among Malaysian patients with advanced cancer: insights from the EORTC QLQ SH-22 questionnaire.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Meta-analysis of the effect of sexual health nursing interventions on improving post-treatment sexual dysfunction and partner relationship satisfaction in breast cancer patients.Sexual medicine · 2026Review
- Sexual health among patients with breast cancer undergoing endocrine therapy: an integrative review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Review
- Understanding Engagement With a Couple-Based Intimacy Enhancement Intervention for Breast Cancer Survivors: An In-Depth Examination of Recruitment and On-Trial Engagement.Psycho-oncology · 2026Article
- Psychological resilience and marital adjustment in breast cancer patients: a multi-center study of serial mediation by anxiety and depression.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Sexual dysfunction after cancer: gender differences, tumor-specific patterns, and implications for sexual medicine practice.Oncology reviews · 2026Review
- Review
- Sexual dysfunction in women with breast cancer: a forgotten aspect among survivors.BMC women's health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis systematic review aims to assess the prevalence, incidence, and risk factors for sexual dysfunction (SdF) in women with breast cancer (BC).
methodsA systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE (PubMed), PsycINFO, Web of Science, and CINAHL to identity longitudinal, observational studies assessing SdF in women with BC. Data extraction followed PRISMA guidelines. The Joanna Briggs Institute checklist was used to assess methodological quality. Results were narratively synthesised.
resultsA total of 16 studies involving 4058 women met the inclusion criteria. Overall, the reported prevalence of SdF ranged from 17.5% before BC diagnosis to 86% after 6 months of hormone therapy. Only one study reported incidence data. The six most commonly studied SdF domains were desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and dyspareunia. A significant number of risk factors associated with different dimensions of SdF were identified.
conclusionSdF is highly prevalent in women with BC, particularly in the first year after diagnosis and treatment. These findings strongly suggest that SdF should be routinely assessed as part of survivorship care protocols. Due to the scant data on incidence rates and the wide variability in reported risk factors, significant gaps remain in our understanding of the onset and progression of SdF in patients with BC. Well-designed cohort studies are needed to better establish the incidence and aetiology of SdF in this patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.