Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40163248›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2025

Long-term survival, patterns of progression, and patterns of use for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma treated with or without Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) in a real-world setting.

Devon C Riegel, Britta L Bureau, Patrick Conlon, Gordon Chavez, Jennifer M Connelly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Neuromodulation in Neuro-Oncology: A Scoping Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. The functional imperative in high-grade glioma.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Devon C RiegelDepartment of Neurology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Road, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA. riegeldevon@gmail.com.
Britta L BureauDepartment of Neurology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Road, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA.
Patrick ConlonNovocure Inc, New York , NY, USA.
Gordon ChavezNovocure Inc, New York , NY, USA.
Jennifer M ConnellyDepartment of Neurology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Road, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTumor Treating Fields therapy (TTFields) is an FDA-approved locoregional treatment for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (ndGBM). Previous trial data showed the addition of TTFields to standard TMZ-based therapy to significantly improve overall survival (OS), but real-world data is lacking, particularly with long follow-up duration. Here, we report real-world survival, patterns of progression, and patterns of use for patients for patients with ndGBM treated with or without TTFields.

methodsPatients diagnosed with GBM and treated with standard of care therapy at the Medical College of Wisconsin between March 2015-March 2023 were included. Survival outcomes were assessed and compared across groups who received or did not receive TTFields therapy during maintenance treatment. Patients were followed through March 1, 2024.

resultsA total of 208 patients (TTFields: n = 109; No-TTFields: n = 99) were included for analysis. Baseline characteristics were consistent across groups. Median OS and PFS were significantly improved for the TTFields group vs. No-TTFields group (median OS: 21.7 vs. 17.7 months, p = 0.029; median PFS: 12.4 vs. 9.6 months, p = 0.047). Patients treated with TTFields exhibited a higher rate of non-local progression vs. No-TTFields group. Median OS and PFS were each significantly longer for the ≥ 75% usage group compared with < 75% via matched analysis.

conclusionThe results of this study reveal an association between TTFields use and long-term survival benefit, consistent with pivotal trial findings. TTFields use is associated with a higher incidence of non-local patterns of progression, and TTFields device usage ≥ 75% is associated with increased progression-free and long-term survival.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsElectric Stimulation TherapyGlioblastomaAdultAgedCombined Modality TherapyDisease ProgressionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateGlioblastomaProgressionTumor Treating FieldsUsage

Identifiers

PMID40163248
PMCPMC12040967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.