Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40163202›Full record

ArticleEcotoxicology (London, England)2025

Bumblebees avoid sucrose solution containing high concentrations of Roundup.

Linzi Jay Thompson, Dara A Stanley, Marie Dacke, Lina Herbertsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecotoxicology (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Linzi Jay ThompsonSchool of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. thompsonlinzi@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6570-6192
Dara A StanleySchool of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8948-8409
Marie DackeVision Group, Department of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6444-7483
Lina HerbertssonVision Group, Department of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8802-1409

Funding

Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine, Ireland 17/S/232Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas 2018-01466
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Herbicides are one of the most heavily applied groups of pesticides globally. Whilst research on herbicides in relation to bees is growing, we still have more to learn about how bees may interact with herbicides and the subsequent consequences for bee health. As herbicides are designed to kill the plants they are applied to, bees and other pollinators may interact with them in a different way to other pesticide groups which is important to understand in the context of evaluating hazard and risk. Here, we conducted both a choice and no-choice test, to determine if bumblebees would be deterred from foraging from feeders containing commercial formulations of Roundup (Ultra and Biactive, respectively) compared to controls. We found across both experiments that bees were deterred from foraging where feeders contained above field-realistic concentrations of Roundup formulation, and that on average colonies reduced their consumption from these feeders by ~50% despite lacking other food sources. This demonstrates that, when given no choice, bees can be deterred from sucrose containing Roundup Biactive, although above expected field concentrations, even to their own nutritional detriment. Separately, individual foragers were observed avoiding feeders containing field-realistic levels of Roundup Ultra compared to controls, showing a preference for uncontaminated feed when given a choice. As this was an experimental setup using high concentrations of Roundup with sucrose solution rather than real flowers, more work is needed to understand this phenomenon under field conditions. This work provides useful information and insights for future studies investigating the impacts of glyphosate in the form of both active substance and formulation on bees and could also be useful in identifying future mitigation strategies for field use.

Indexed as

GlycineHerbicidesSucroseAnimalsBeesFeeding BehaviorGlyphosateGlycineGlyphosateHerbicidesSucroseBeesEcotoxicologyGlyphosatePesticideWeedkiller

Identifiers

PMID40163202
PMCPMC12254069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.