Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40163180›Full record

ReviewCurrent obesity reports2025

Physiology of Weight Regain after Weight Loss: Latest Insights.

Marleen A van Baak, Edwin C M Mariman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current obesity reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marleen A van BaakDepartment of Human Biology, NUTRIM Institute of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Faculty of Health, Medicine and life Sciences+, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands. m.vanbaak@maastrichtuniversity.nl.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2592-6363
Edwin C M MarimanDepartment of Human Biology, NUTRIM Institute of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Faculty of Health, Medicine and life Sciences+, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5691-8633

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis review summarizes the most recent research on the physiology of weight regain. It describes developments in areas that are currently being addressed and that may indicate promising directions for future research. RECENT

findingsWeight regain occurs independent of the way prior weight loss is achieved, i.e. by lifestyle, surgery or pharmacotherapy. Recent novel findings regarding weight regain belong to four areas. First, the immune obesity memory of which besides persistent immune cells promoting weight regain cells have been found that reduce weight regain. Second, the gut microbiome where autologous transplantation can limit weight regain. Third, the composition of the weight loss with the percentage of lost fat-free mass being inverse to the amount of regained weight independent of the weight loss procedure. Fourth, appetite control where after weight loss altered hypothalamic activity promoting hunger and weight regain persists, possibly mediated by altered neurotensin responses. In all four areas more conclusive evidence for their role in weight regain still needs to be obtained. Most studies on physiological mechanisms of weight regain are associative in nature and the number of intervention studies is very limited. To bring the field further, carefully designed intervention studies taking into account the dynamic character of weight loss and weight regain are needed.

Indexed as

ObesityWeight GainWeight LossAppetite RegulationGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansGut microbiotaImmune memoryLean massObesityWeight regain

Identifiers

PMID40163180
PMCPMC11958498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.