Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40163160›Full record

ArticleHealth & justice2025

The importance of contextually specific support relationships in implementing programs to link people to medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) treatment during reentry from county jails.

Margaret McGladrey, Marisa Booty, Susannah Stitzer, Hannah K Knudsen, Sharon L Walsh, Michael Goetz, Hallie Mattingly, Michelle Lofwall, Laura Fanucchi, Devin Oller and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health & justice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Margaret McGladreyUniversity of Kentucky, Lexington, USA. margaret.mcgladrey@uky.edu.
Marisa BootyUniversity of Kentucky, Lexington, USA.
Susannah StitzerUniversity of Kentucky, Lexington, USA.
Hannah K KnudsenUniversity of Kentucky, Lexington, USA.
Sharon L WalshUniversity of Kentucky, Lexington, USA.
Michael GoetzUniversity of Kentucky, Lexington, USA.
Hallie MattinglyUniversity of Kentucky, Lexington, USA.
Michelle LofwallUniversity of Kentucky, Lexington, USA.
Laura FanucchiUniversity of Kentucky, Lexington, USA.
Devin OllerUniversity of Kentucky, Lexington, USA.
Amanda Fallin-BennettUniversity of Kentucky, Lexington, USA.
Carrie B OserUniversity of Kentucky, Lexington, USA.

Funding

Kentucky CAN HEAL (Communities and Networks Helping End Addiction Long-term)UM1DA049406 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI WALSH, SHARON L. · 2019 to 2022
$81.7M
National Institutes of Health and the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration UM1DA049406NIDA NIH HHS UM1 DA049406
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study uses the Practical, Robust, Implementation, and Sustainability Model (PRISM) and Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) model to describe how features of jail contexts are associated with the number of people linked to medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) and sustainment of jail linkage programs implemented in Wave 1 of the HEALing Communities Study in Kentucky (HCS-KY) from 2021 to 22. The HCS-KY is part of a parallel-group, cluster-randomized wait-list controlled trial examining the effects of supporting wide-scale implementation of evidence-based practices to reduce opioid overdose deaths. One strategy involved implementation of MOUD linkage programs within five Kentucky county jails. Minutes from program planning and maintenance meetings led by HCS-KY implementation facilitators with linkage staff/supervisors and jail liaisons/partners (average of five participants/meeting) were coded following PRISM-RE-AIM using template analysis to understand variations in participation across sites as well as barriers to and facilitators of MOUD linkage implementation.

resultsAcross the five jails, 277 participants met with linkage staff during and/or post-incarceration for 1,119 visits conducted in-person or via phone/video conference. Twenty-six participants linked to community-based MOUD treatment during the implementation period. Participation differed across sites based on jail and linkage staff utilization of implementation support strategies but did not affect program sustainment, which all jails pursued in some form. Qualitative analysis yielded four overarching themes characterizing jail linkage program implementation. First, program integration into jail infrastructure entailed navigation of jail facilities and technologies as well as legal factors surrounding linkage staff backgrounds and information-sharing. Second, adapting the intervention to site-specific needs required providing training and implementation support to jail and linkage staff tailored to each jail context. Third, facilitating inter-organizational and cross-system coordination was related to collaboration successes and challenges among the HCS-KY team, linkage staff, the courts, and other provider partners. Finally, staffing and legal factors influenced sustainment.

conclusionsOnly ~ 10% of participants linked to community-based MOUD despite intensive implementation support, yet jails highly valued the program and planned for sustainment. Given the complexities in postponing treatment initiation until reentry, we call for simultaneous efforts to integrate MOUD screening and treatment into jail booking processes.

Indexed as

County jailsImplementation scienceImplementation support practitionerLinkage to MOUD treatmentOpioid overdose reductionOUD service access and utilizationReentry services

Identifiers

PMID40163160
PMCPMC11956208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.