ArticleTropical animal health and production2025
Detection of tuberculous and non-tuberculous mycobacterial species in trans-tracheal washes of cattle and buffaloes with respiratory distress.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Molecular identification and resistance-associated gene profiling of non-tuberculous mycobacteria isolated from bovine clinical samples.Molecular biology reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bovine tuberculosis (bTB) is a zoonotic disease that affects domestic and wild animals, including livestock. The purpose of the study was to detect tuberculous and non-tuberculous mycobacterial species from buffaloes and cattle with respiratory signs and positive intradermal tuberculin test. Eighteen trans-tracheal washes (TTW) were obtained from buffaloes (n = 5) and cattle (n = 13) with respiratory distress. All the collected samples were subjected to microscopic examination, direct PCR screening, and bacteriological culture in Middlebrook7H10 media followed by PCR. One sample revealed the presence of acid-fast bacilli on microscopic examination. Six out of eighteen TTW samples tested positive for the hsp65 gene indicative of the Mycobacterium genus. Two samples were positive through direct PCR and were further identified as Mycobacterium orygis and Mycobacterium kansasii. However, out of the 18 TTW samples, two samples yielded Mycobacterium kansasii isolates on culturing, which were confirmed using species-specific PCR. Our study indicates PCR is a better screening test of the TTW samples for the detection of both tuberculous and non-tuberculous mycobacteria compared to microscopic examination and culturing. The presence of non-tuberculous mycobacteria may affect the results of tuberculinization in cattle and PCR screening of the tested animals will assist in validating the tuberculin test results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40163104What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.