ReviewNeuroradiology2025
Patterns of abnormal magnetic susceptibility in the brain: an image-based review.
Review in Neuroradiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Imaging characteristics, yield of computed tomography, and clinical outcomes of central nervous system nocardiosis.Infection · 2026Article
- Aeromedical decision-making for asymptomatic cerebral cavernous malformations in military pilots.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis article is designed to facilitate a systematic approach to formulating a radiologic differential diagnosis based on the pattern of abnormal magnetic susceptibility on MRI. Susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) is a three-dimensional sequence with excellent spatial resolution and superior contrast resolution. It originated from and has largely replaced two-dimensional T2
methodsThere are many entities that have specific patterns unique on SWI. We chose both entities that are commonly encountered in the clinical practice and unusual entities that may present as challenges in making the diagnosis. Each entity is discussed in detail, focusing on salient imaging features seen with SWI and key differences highlighted from other entities.
resultsIn the first category, lesions with randomly distributed susceptibility abnormalities are described. Further classification is made based on the presence of foci of susceptibility located diffusely through the brain (e.g. diffuse axonal injury) noting the subtleties of the shape, size, and preferential distribution of these foci. Special attention is also directed toward entities that, while random in location, are associated with a specific lesion (e.g. abscess). Finally, clues to correctly diagnose the various pathologies are provided. In the second category, the focus is on lesions that can be classified based upon anatomic locations whether peripheral (e.g. sulcal hemosiderin) versus central distribution.
conclusionKnowledge of the patterns of susceptibility on SWI and the physics behind this technique are essential for facilitating MR interpretation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40163097What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.