ArticleJournal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999)2025
The Strategies Timeline and Activities Reporting Tables: Improving HIV Care by Improving the Reporting of Implementation Strategies.
Article in Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dissemination of an evidence-based motivational interviewing brief intervention for substance use disorders to HIV service organizations across the United States: protocol for a national-level cluster-randomized adaptive parallel-groups superiority experiment.Addiction science & clinical practice · 2025Article
- Enduring contributions to implementation science: Honoring the legacy of Bryan R. Garner.Frontiers in health services · 2025Article
- Using Incentivization as a Strategy to Improve Implementation of a Motivational Interviewing Brief Intervention for Substance Use Disorders in HIV Settings: Results of a 26-Site Parallel Groups Cluster-Randomized Type-3 Hybrid Trial.Implementation research and practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe United States has made significant progress toward achieving the goals of its Ending the HIV Epidemic initiative. However, systematic reviews on HIV implementation research have identified problems regarding strategy specification that limit the research's transparency and replicability, and in turn limit improvements regarding HIV care in real-world practice.
methodsThe strategies timeline, activities, and resources (STAResources) Table, developed as part of the substance abuse treatment to HIV Care II Project, was completed for it and 3 other HIV implementation research projects funded by the National Institute of Health. Each evaluated it in terms of the extent to which it addressed prior recommendations on strategy specification; issues related to rigor and reproducibility; and the extent to which it seemed pragmatic, simple, adaptable, relevant, helpful, useful, acceptable, appropriate, suitable, applicable, and fitting. Each was rated on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all; 1 = a little; 2 = moderately, and 3 = very much).
resultsOverall, the STAResources Table was rated favorably. It received a mean of 3.0 (SD = 0) in terms of being pragmatic, relevant, helpful, acceptable, appropriate, and applicable. The Strategies Timeline, Activities, and Rationale (STARationale) Table emerged during the process and was also rated favorably.
conclusionsTo help the Ending the HIV Epidemic initiative achieve its goals, there is a critical need for transparent and replicable implementation research on identifying the most effective strategies for equitably implementing evidence-based practices within real-world settings. Addressing this need, the Strategies Timeline and Activities Reporting (STAReporting)Tables are pragmatic tools for helping improve the transparency and replicability of implementation strategy research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.