ArticleJournal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999)2025
Lessons Learned From Engaging Healthcare Providers in Research on Implementation of HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis.
Article in Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Developing an HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Toolkit for Adolescent and Young Adults: Serving Primary Care Providers to Support Future Implementation Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.AIDS patient care and STDs · 2026Article
- Dissemination experiences and preferences from HIV service delivery organizations.Implementation science communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHealth care providers are critical for successful implementation of HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP), but barriers to PrEP provision persist. Researchers must engage with providers to understand how to optimize PrEP delivery across settings. Yet researcher-provider collaborations can be challenging. To offer guidance on engaging providers in PrEP implementation research, we synthesized the experiences of researchers working with different types of providers on studies related to PrEP implementation that were funded as part of the US Ending the HIV Epidemic (EHE) initiative.
settingGeographic areas designated as high priority by the EHE initiative.
methodsWe defined providers broadly, including physicians, pharmacists, health educators, and peer navigators. Using thematic analysis from collaborative case reports by EHE study teams, we synthesized strategies, challenges, and successes related to provider engagement, with categorization into three stages of research: study development, recruitment, and data collection.
resultsAmong 17 research teams invited, 9 contributed. Findings suggested that extensive resources (eg, time, professional networks, financial, and nonfinancial incentives) are required to engage clinical and nonclinical providers across all stages of PrEP implementation research, with the most intensive strategies required for recruiting clinical providers who are not yet providing PrEP. However, when effective strategies are deployed, this investment of resources can yield rich insights into PrEP implementation.
conclusionsThe lessons learned by the investigators in our study can be applied to future EHE-funded projects, other HIV-prevention studies, and studies in other areas of health research to improve engagement of providers during all stages of the research process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.