ArticleJournal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999)2025
Communities Started the End of the HIV Epidemic: Experiences With and Recommendations for Conducting Community-Engaged HIV Implementation Research.
Article in Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Medical-Legal Partnerships as Structural Interventions: Integrating Implementation Science and Community-Engaged Research to Advance HIV Care.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2026Article
- Using a Syringe Service Program-Based Community Advisory Board to Expand HIV Testing, Overdose Prevention, and PrEP Linkage in a Southern Black Neighborhood.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026Article
- Community-engaged research in HIV implementation science: a cross-sectional assessment of meaningful engagement among community and academic recipients of 2021 and 2022 'ending the HIV epidemic' supplement awards.Implementation science communications · 2026Article
- Article
- Factors associated with one-night stands among men who have sex with men recruited via the internet: a cross-sectional survey in China.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
abstractCommunities of people living with or impacted by HIV have been at the forefront of HIV research, from identifying the health priorities to advocating for the development and implementation of interventions that benefit affected populations and individuals. Community engagement is considered fundamental for successful implementation of science projects. However, researchers have acknowledged the limited guidance on community engagement for implementation science research. Some recommendations have been made for community engagement in implementation sciences, but conducting HIV implementation research must consider the unique challenges of addressing the stigma and disenfranchisement of the populations affected. Despite the specific difficulties for community-engaged implementation science research, there are successful experiences and lessons learned that could support future fruitful experiences. This publication aims to share recommendations for community-engaged HIV implementation research based on the expertise of community-academic partnerships. These recommendations include the perspectives of academic and community partners. Community engagement in HIV implementation research will be needed beyond ending the epidemic. The future of community engagement in research may lay in embracing the constant change and securing the mechanisms to respond to it.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.