ArticleJournal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999)2025
Improving Community-Engaged Implementation Science: Perspectives From "Ending the HIV Epidemic" Supplement Award Cases in the United States.
Article in Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Community-engaged research in HIV implementation science: a cross-sectional assessment of meaningful engagement among community and academic recipients of 2021 and 2022 'ending the HIV epidemic' supplement awards.Implementation science communications · 2026Article
- Article
- Dissemination experiences and preferences from HIV service delivery organizations.Implementation science communications · 2025Article
- Community-Engaged Research in HIV Implementation Science: Characterizing Academic and Community Partnerships in the "Ending the HIV Epidemic" Supplement Awards.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCommunity-engaged research (CEnR) is fundamental to effective HIV prevention and treatment implementation, although limited in practice. We describe CEnR lessons learned by researchers in HIV-related implementation science to improve future CEnR.
settingAcademic-community research partnerships funded by the 2019-2021 National Institutes of Health Ending the HIV Epidemic (EHE) supplement awards.
methodsSeven individual awardees representing 8 EHE awards documented partnership characteristics and key CEnR experiences in an online form. Three semi-structured reflection sessions subsequently discussed experiences, identifying opportunities and barriers using qualitative thematic analysis, iterative dialogue, and illustrative case studies.
resultsAwardees identified both partnerships newly established for the grant (60%) and preexisting collaborations (40%). Key perceived CEnR benefits included: new and better project ideas; improved project implementation; and priorities to guide future research. Prominent barriers included: administrative burdens resulting in delayed funding access that constrained partner engagement; limited grant timelines and funding for essential preimplementation partnership building; and limited recognition of key CEnR activities in academic success metrics. Adaptive responses to barriers included focusing short award periods on exploratory aims and building on extant community activities.
conclusionsSystems-level redesign at the funder and university levels could improve CEnR equity, including accepting financial risk between grant award and funding receipt to facilitate completion of essential prework such as Institutional Review Board approvals and prevent the exclusion of the more financially constrained community partners or forcing unfunded effort provision and establishing appropriate support and promotion criteria for CEnR-engaged faculty. Thus, enabling CEnR good practices can improve future HIV-related implementation research and EHE goal achievement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.