Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40163048›Full record

Trial reportHealth technology assessment (Winchester, England)2025

A group psychological intervention for postnatal depression in British mothers of South Asian origin - the ROSHNI-2 RCT.

Nusrat Husain, Karina Lovell, Carolyn A Chew-Graham, Farah Lunat, Penny Bee, Matthias Pierce, Najia Atif, Saadia Aseem, Kamaldeep Bhui, Peter Bower and 20 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Health technology assessment (Winchester, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Public and Patient Involvement and Engagement in Clinical Trials: A Multi-Perspective Mixed-Methods Evaluation of the ROWTATE Programme.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors.

Nusrat HusainDivision of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9493-0721
Karina LovellDivision of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8821-895X
Carolyn A Chew-GrahamSchool of Medicine, Keele University, Newcastle, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9722-9981
Farah LunatResearch and Development, Lancashire & South Cumbria NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4091-6139
Penny BeeDivision of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5600-0400
Matthias PierceSchool of Health Sciences, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2182-0369
Najia AtifPerinatal Mental Health, Human Development Research Foundation, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-9540-9356
Saadia AseemDivision of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0393-4581
Kamaldeep BhuiDepartment of Psychiatry & Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Wadham College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9205-2144
Peter BowerCentre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9558-3349
Traolach BrughaCentre for Psychological Health and Development, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9786-9591
Nasim ChaudhryPakistan Institute of Living and Learning, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0003-4142-868X
Akbar UllahDivision of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2807-500X
Linda DaviesDivision of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8801-3559
Nadeem GireManchester Global Foundation, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4130-6626
Deepali SharmaThe University of Bolton, Bolton, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0170-9102
Jahanara MiahDivision of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2122-7007
Waqas AhmedInstitute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3772-194X
Joe KaiSchool of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9040-9384
Ilyas MirzaBarnet, Enfield & Haringey Mental Health NHS Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2804-1173
Jillian MorrisonGeneral Practice and Primary Care, School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3721-091X
Naeem MohmedResearch and Development, Lancashire & South Cumbria NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0080-9905
Atif RahmanInstitute of Life and Human Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2066-4467
Shanaya RathodSouthern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Research and Innovation Department, Faculty of Science, University of Portsmouth, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5126-3503
Najma SiddiqiDepartment for Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1794-2152
Waquas WaheedCentre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0756-2263
Christopher WilliamsInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0964-2048
Nosheen ZaidiResearch and Development, Lancashire & South Cumbria NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5299-5789
Richard EmsleyDepartment of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1218-675X
Richard MorrissInstitute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2910-4121

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Postnatal depression is more common in British South Asian women than white women in the United Kingdom. Despite empirical evidence suggesting the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioural therapy as a first line of treatment, little evidence is available regarding its applicability to different minority ethnic groups. Objectives: Determining the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a culturally adapted group psychological intervention (Positive Health Programme) in primary care for British South Asian women with postnatal depression compared with treatment as usual. Setting: General practices and children's centres in the North West, East Midlands, Yorkshire, Glasgow and London. Participants: British South Asian women meeting the Design: A multicentre randomised controlled trial with an internal pilot and partially nested design to compare treatment as usual plus the Positive Health Programme with treatment as usual in British South Asian women with postnatal depression, with a qualitative study to examine the acceptability and feasibility of the intervention. Intervention: The Positive Health Programme, a culturally adapted group intervention based on the principles of cognitive-behavioural therapy delivered by facilitators over 12 sessions. Outcomes measures: The primary outcome was recovery from depression (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale ≤ 7) at end of intervention (approximately 4-6 months). Analysis of the primary outcome and the long-term follow-up (at 12 months) used a logistic random-effects model to estimate the odds ratio of caseness between treatments, adjusting for centre, severity of depression and education at baseline. Cost data were collected using an Economic Patient Questionnaire. Results: Seven hundred and thirty-two participants across four study centres were randomised by the Manchester Clinical Trials Unit. At 4 months, almost half of patients in the treatment (Positive Health Programme) group were recovered (138 or 49%), whereas 105 (37%) were recovered in the control (treatment as usual) group. By 12 months, the control (treatment as usual) and treatment (Positive Health Programme) group had over 50% recovery at 140 (54%) and 141 (54%), respectively. For the primary outcome, recovery from postnatal depression at end of intervention, we found a significant effect such that the odds of achieving recovery in the treatment group were almost twice as high compared to the treatment as usual group (odds ratio 1.97, 95% confidence interval 1.26 to 3.10). Between the two groups, there was no significant difference in the odds of recovery at 12 months (odds ratio 1.02, 95% confidence interval 0.62 to 1.66), highlighting a need for more intensive therapies and/or longer-term care plans for this group of patients. Qualitative results: The intervention was considered feasible and acceptable from the perspectives of Positive Health Programme participants, facilitators, and general practitioners. The findings suggest improved emotional and social support and an enhanced sense of well-being. Economic evaluation: Positive Health Programme implementation was estimated to cost an average of £408 per participant. The intention-to-treat analysis shows that the Positive Health Programme intervention costs £22,198 per quality-adjusted life-year gain. Positive Health Programme was cost-effective on average but with a substantial uncertainty: the probability that Positive Health Programme was cost-effective was 44% (65%) at the willingness to pay £20,000 (£30,000) per quality-adjusted life-year. The Positive Health Programme was highly cost-effective for those who attended 5-8 sessions, costing £9040 per quality-adjusted life-year. Limitations: The study sample limits generalisability with other ethnic minority groups, and the cost-effectiveness analysis did not explore recall bias. Conclusions: The results of this study provide robust evidence that the culturally adapted psychological intervention for postnatal depression in South Asian women is effective at the primary end point and acceptable to women. Future work: Further development of the Positive Health Programme intervention and evaluation, with longer-term outcome follow-ups and exploration of cost-effectiveness of remote delivery of the Positive Health Programme. Study registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN10697380. Funding: This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: 14/68/08) and is published in full in

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyDepression, PostpartumMothersPsychotherapy, GroupAdultCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansSouth Asian PeopleUnited KingdomYoung AdultANXIETYBANGLADESHCHILDDEPRESSIONETHNIC AND RACIAL MINORITIESETHNICITYFEMALEINDIALINGUISTICSMINORITY GROUPSPAKISTANPARENTINGPOLICYPOSTPARTUMPSYCHOSOCIAL INTERVENTIONRANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIALSOUTH ASIAN PEOPLESRI LANKASURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES

Identifiers

PMID40163048
PMCPMC11973614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.