ArticleThe journal of spinal cord medicine2026
Clinical validation of a rule-based decision tree algorithm for classifying hip movements in people with spinal cord injury.
Article in The journal of spinal cord medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A robotic-assisted intervention (ROBERT®) to enhance muscle strength in the hip flexor muscles following spinal cord injury: A pilot within-person randomized controlled trial.The journal of spinal cord medicine · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess a rule-based decision tree algorithm's performance for classifying and counting specific hip flexion repetitions in able-bodied people and to validate the algorithm's efficacy for people with spinal cord injury (SCI). Alternative placement of the accelerometer was tested. STUDY
designA validation study.
settingSpecialized SCI center in Denmark.
methodsTen able-bodied people and 10 people with SCI were recruited. All participants completed a 15-minute predefined protocol with the following movements: hip flexion in supine 90°, 45° and 20°, hip abduction, pelvic lift, transfer from supine to sitting, sit-to-stand, transfer to a wheelchair, pushed in a wheelchair, Motomed cycling, walking and steps in Nustep fitness trainer. All wore accelerometers on the thigh and a chest-mounted GoPro camera to establish ground truth.
resultsConfusion matrixes showed that able-bodied people's activities and specific hip movements can be classified and the number of repetitions counted with 0.86 accuracy. The algorithm's performance did not change substantially depending on the position of the accelerometer. For people with movement deficits caused by SCI, the accuracy lowered to 0.66 but could be improved to 0.79 for classifying and counting this population's activities/movements overall.
conclusionThe algorithm tested could classify specific hip movements and other activities in the SCI population. This method using a single accelerometer may be applied in clinical trials for people with SCI to objectively assess the change in the number of repetitions over time of hip flexion movements, walking and sit-to-stand activities and to some extent hip abduction and pelvic lift.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.