ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025
Automatic Human Embryo Volume Measurement in First Trimester Ultrasound From the Rotterdam Periconception Cohort: Quantitative and Qualitative Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cohort Profile Update: the Rotterdam Periconceptional Cohort-biomarkers, lifestyle intervention, and artificial intelligence.International journal of epidemiology · 2026Article
- Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Women With Immune Abnormalities: Machine Learning Model Development and Validation Using First-Trimester Sonographic Features.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Development of an AI model to predict tooth movement during orthodontic treatment.Bioinformation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNoninvasive volumetric measurements during the first trimester of pregnancy provide unique insight into human embryonic growth and development. However, current methods, such as semiautomatic (eg, virtual reality [VR]) or manual segmentation (eg, VOCAL) are not used in routine care due to their time-consuming nature, requirement for specialized training, and introduction of inter- and intrarater variability.
objectiveThis study aimed to address the challenges of manual and semiautomatic measurements, our objective is to develop an automatic artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm to segment the region of interest and measure embryonic volume (EV) and head volume (HV) during the first trimester of pregnancy.
methodsWe used 3D ultrasound datasets from the Rotterdam Periconception Cohort, collected between 7 and 11 weeks of gestational age. We measured the EV in gestational weeks 7, 9 and 11, and the HV in weeks 9 and 11. To develop the AI algorithms for measuring EV and HV, we used nnU-net, a state-of-the-art segmentation algorithm that is publicly available. We tested the algorithms on 164 (EV) and 92 (HV) datasets, both acquired before 2020. The AI algorithm's generalization to data acquired in the future was evaluated by testing on 116 (EV) and 58 (HV) datasets from 2020. The performance of the model was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between the volume obtained using AI and using VR. In addition, 2 experts qualitatively rated both VR and AI segmentations for the EV and HV.
resultsWe found that segmentation of both the EV and HV using AI took around a minute additionally, rating took another minute, hence in total, volume measurement took 2 minutes per ultrasound dataset, while experienced raters needed 5-10 minutes using a VR tool. For both the EV and HV, we found an ICC of 0.998 on the test set acquired before 2020 and an ICC of 0.996 (EV) and 0.997 (HV) for data acquired in 2020. During qualitative rating for the EV, a comparable proportion (AI: 42%, VR: 38%) were rated as excellent; however, we found that major errors were more common with the AI algorithm, as it more frequently missed limbs. For the HV, the AI segmentations were rated as excellent in 79% of cases, compared with only 17% for VR.
conclusionsWe developed 2 fully automatic AI algorithms to accurately measure the EV and HV in the first trimester on 3D ultrasound data. In depth qualitative analysis revealed that the quality of the measurement for AI and VR were similar. Since automatic volumetric assessment now only takes a couple of minutes, the use of these measurements in pregnancy for monitoring growth and development during this crucial period, becomes feasible, which may lead to better screening, diagnostics, and treatment of developmental disorders in pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.