Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40163020›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2025

Strong Coupling Møller-Plesset Perturbation Theory.

Yassir El Moutaoukal, Rosario R Riso, Matteo Castagnola, Enrico Ronca, Henrik Koch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Perspective on Many-Body Methods for Molecular Polaritonic Systems.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yassir El MoutaoukalDepartment of Chemistry, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0009-0002-4551-7188
Rosario R RisoDepartment of Chemistry, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-6870-4237
Matteo CastagnolaDepartment of Chemistry, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-7700-7030
Enrico RoncaDepartment of Chemistry, Biology and Biotechnology, University of Perugia, Via Elce di Sotto, 8, 06123 Perugia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0494-5506
Henrik KochDepartment of Chemistry, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-8367-8727

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perturbative approaches are methods to efficiently tackle many-body problems, offering both intuitive insights and analysis of correlation effects. However, their application to systems where light and matter are strongly coupled is nontrivial. Specifically, the definition of suitable orbitals for the zeroth-order Hamiltonian represents a significant theoretical challenge. While reviewing previously investigated orbital choices, this work presents an alternative polaritonic orbital basis suitable for the strong coupling regime. We develop a quantum electrodynamical (QED) Møller-Plesset perturbation theory using orbitals obtained from the strong coupling QED Hartree-Fock. We assess the strengths and limitations of the different approaches with emphasis on frequency and coupling strength dispersions, intermolecular interactions and polarization orientational effects. The results show the essential role of using a consistent molecular orbital framework in order to achieve an accurate description of cavity-induced electron-photon correlation effects.

Identifiers

PMID40163020
PMCPMC12020365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.