ArticleAdvanced biology2025
Scaling Up Synthetic Cell Production Using Robotics and Machine Learning Toward Therapeutic Applications.
Article in Advanced biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phosphoserine as an Alternative Energy Source forACS synthetic biology · 2026Article
- Building a Synthetic Cell Together.Nature communications · 2025Review
- Scaling Up Synthetic Cell Production Using Robotics and Machine Learning Toward Therapeutic Applications.Advanced biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Synthetic cells (SCs), developed through bottom-up synthetic biology, hold great potential for biomedical applications, with the promise of replacing malfunctioning natural cells and treating diseases with spatiotemporal control. Currently, most SC synthesis and characterization processes are manual, limiting scalability and efficiency. In this study, an automated method is developed for large-scale production of protein-producing SCs for therapeutic applications. The optimized process, compatible with a robotic liquid handling system (LiHa), reduces production time by half. Additionally, incorporation of an automated tissue dissociator-based emulsification increases batch size 30-fold while preserving SC characteristics. To assess SC quality and protein synthesis, artificial intelligence (AI)-based image analysis is employed, allowing for automated, accurate and high-throughput SC characterization. Large-scale luciferase-expressing SCs from a single homogeneous batch are administered to mice, allowing for real-time monitoring of protein expression and reducing experimental variability. By troubleshooting several central steps in SC synthesis, it is demonstrated that automation and computerized quality control can significantly improve the process of SC synthesis for preclinical and clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.