Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40162685›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2025

Dosimetric impact of positional uncertainties and a robust optimization approach for rectal intensity-modulated brachytherapy.

Björn Morén, Alana Thibodeau-Antonacci, Jonathan Kalinowski, Shirin A Enger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Björn MorénMedical Physics Unit, Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Alana Thibodeau-AntonacciMedical Physics Unit, Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Jonathan KalinowskiMedical Physics Unit, Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5501-618X
Shirin A EngerMedical Physics Unit, Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.

Funding

Calcul QuebecCanada Research Chairs 252135Digitial Research Alliance of CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada CGS D3-559201-2021Swedish Governmental Agency for Innovation Systems 2022-01552Vetenskapsrådet VR-NT 2019-05416Vetenskapsrådet VR-NT2023-04181
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntensity-modulated brachytherapy (IMBT) employs rotating high-Z shields during treatment to decrease radiation in certain directions and conform the dose distribution to the target volume. Prototypes for dynamic IMBT have been proposed for prostate, cervical, and rectal cancer. PURPOSE: We considered two shielded applicators for IMBT rectal cancer treatment and investigated how rotational uncertainties in the shield angle and translational uncertainties in the source position affect plan evaluation criteria.

methodsThe effect of rotational errors of

resultsFor the largest investigated rotational error of

conclusionsWe have quantified the effect of rotational shield and translational source errors of various magnitudes on evaluation criteria for rectal IMBT. The robust optimization approach was generally not able to mitigate positional errors. However, it resulted in more homogeneous dwell times, which can be beneficial in conventional high-dose-rate brachytherapy to avoid hot spots around specific dwell positions.

Indexed as

BrachytherapyRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRectal NeoplasmsHumansMonte Carlo MethodRadiometryRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedUncertaintyintensity modulated brachytherapyrectal cancerrobust optimization

Identifiers

PMID40162685
PMCPMC12149728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.