ArticleInternal medicine journal2025
Current practice and attitudes in emergency department management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax in Australia and New Zealand: a scenario-based/survey.
Article in Internal medicine journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exploring Inter-Rater Agreement in Classification of Radiological Features of Tension in Adults With Primary Spontaneous Pneumothorax.Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundManagement of primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) has long been contentious.
aimsTo identify the factors influencing interventional versus conservative management and to assess current practice patterns for moderate-to-large PSP in emergency department (ED) patients.
methodsAnonymous online survey of emergency medicine, respiratory medicine and thoracic surgery specialists and trainees in Australia and New Zealand. Data collected included rating the decision-making importance of potential drivers of interventional versus conservative management for PSP, initial management preference for stable patients with moderate-large PSP based on three X-ray-based scenarios (one moderate-large, one almost total collapse without mediastinal shift and one large with mediastinal shift) and awareness of evidence and current guidelines for the management of PSP.
resultsThere were 456 responses; 85.5% were from Australia. The most commonly reported factors influencing treatment decision-making were vital signs (96.7%) and patient-reported dyspnoea (84.3%). There was variation between specialty groups in initial treatment preference for all scenarios (P < 0.001) and a reduction in preference for conservative treatment as the magnitude of radiological features increased (93.8% vs 61.5% vs 32.1% respectively). Guideline recommendation awareness was low except for the 2023 British Thoracic Society guideline (60.4%).
conclusionThis study demonstrates variation of opinion regarding the initial management of stable patients with moderate to large PSP and an increasing preference for intervention as the magnitude of radiological features increases. Guideline awareness was low, highlighting the need for an evidence-based approach to PSP management in the ED that is widely understood and accepted across speciality groups and that prioritises patient symptoms over X-ray findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.