Observational studyPsychological medicine2025
Longitudinal associations of naturalistic psychedelic use with psychotic and manic symptoms.
Observational study in Psychological medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Psychedelic-induced hypomania and mania: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Molecular psychiatry · 2026Pooled it
- Psychedelic Safety and Clinical Outcomes Across Exposure Patterns: A Structured Narrative Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Novel approaches in depression treatment: from rapid-acting antidepressants to personalized interventions.Molecular psychiatry · 2026Review
- Politically Salient Events May Modulate Effects of Naturalistic Psychedelic Use on Support for Partisan Violence.Psychedelic medicine (New Rochelle, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- The science of psychedelic medicine.Nature medicine · 2026Review
- Classifying Psychedelic-Related Complications.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2026Review
- Hospital-based care for hallucinogens and risk of mania and bipolar disorder: A population-based cohort study.PLoS medicine · 2025Article
- Naturalistic psychedelic use and changes in depressive symptoms.Journal of affective disorders · 2025Observational
- Microdosing Psychedelics to Restore Synaptic Density in Schizophrenia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFindings from contemporary clinical trials suggest that psychedelics are generally safe and may be effective in the treatment of various psychiatric disorders. However, less is known about the risks associated with psychedelic use outside of medically supervised contexts, particularly in populations that are typically excluded from participation in clinical trials.
methodsUsing a preregistered longitudinal observational research design with a purposive sample of US residents between 18 and 50 years old (
resultsThe follow-up survey was completed by 12,345 participants (56% retention), with 505 participants reporting psychedelic use during the 2-month study period. In covariate-adjusted regression models, psychedelic use during the study period was associated with increases in the severity of psychotic and manic symptoms. However, such increases were only observed for those who reported psychedelic use in an illegal context. While increases in the severity of psychotic symptoms appeared to depend on the frequency of use and the intensity of challenging psychedelic experiences, increases in the severity of manic symptoms appeared to be moderated by a personal history of schizophrenia or bipolar I disorder and the subjective experience of insight during a psychedelic experience.
conclusionsThe findings suggest that naturalistic psychedelic use specifically in illegal contexts may lead to increases in the severity of psychotic and manic symptoms. Such increases may depend on the frequency of use, the acute subjective psychedelic experience, and psychiatric history.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.