Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40162485›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of technology assessment in health care2025

Real-world evidence to support health technology assessment and payer decision making: is it now or never?

Linda A Murphy, Ron Akehurst, David Cunningham, Gérard de Pouvourville, Oriol Solà-Morales

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of technology assessment in health care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Next-generation methods in health technology assessment (HTA): need, rigor, and implementability.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Global & regional health technology assessment
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Linda A MurphyLumanity Inc, Sheffield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-0891-2234
Ron AkehurstLumanity Inc, Sheffield, UK.
David CunninghamIndependent Consultant, Surrey, UK.
Gérard de PouvourvilleESSEC Business School, Cergy, France.
Oriol Solà-MoralesFundació HiTT, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8312-8178

Funding

Novartis
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this policy article is twofold: (i) to provide a summary and update of recent important policy developments, in particular relevant guidance on the use of real-world data/real-world evidence (RWD/RWE) by health technology assessment (HTA) bodies and (ii) to set out our policy recommendations on how the different elements of an "RWE framework" we have previously developed could support, further enhance and facilitate the use of RWE for HTA purposes and by HTA bodies and payers.

methodsWe undertook a targeted review and analysis of recent important policy developments. The aim was to build on our recommendations from previous work on the "RWE Framework," and consider how the relevant tools from our Framework can further enhance and facilitate the use of RWE for HTA purposes and by HTA bodies/payers.

resultsWe provide eight conditions that we argue would, in combination, constitute the optimal use and acceptance of RWD/RWE for HTA. We believe that, should the eight conditions hold, RWD/RWE would enable more efficient access to medicines and healthcare technologies for patients.

conclusionsHigh-quality, fit-for-purpose RWD/RWE can and should be used more frequently in HTA. Multi-stakeholder and cross-geography collaborative partnerships are needed to align on best practices to optimize the evidence that needs to be generated to satisfy all stakeholders' needs.

Indexed as

Decision MakingTechnology Assessment, BiomedicalHealth PolicyHumansPolicy Makingclinical needdata governanceguidancehealth technology assessmentpayerspopulation healthreal-world datareal-world evidence

Identifiers

PMID40162485
PMCPMC12018852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.