ArticleBioinformation2024
An update on attachment systems for mandibular implant overdentures: A review.
Article in Bioinformation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- To infinity and beyond: the promise of data-driven 3D printing of hernia mesh - a primer for surgeons.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present systematic review aims to evaluate the global use of attachment systems for mandibular implant overdentures, focusing on their impact on clinical outcomes, patient satisfaction and prosthesis stability. Mandibular overdentures supported by implants have become a standard of care for edentulous patients, with various attachment systems such as bar, ball and locators being commonly utilized. The review synthesizes findings from numerous studies, examining differences in retention, ease of maintenance, cost-effectiveness and long-term success rates across different attachment modalities. The analysis also delves into patient-centered outcomes, including comfort, ease of use and quality of life, providing a comprehensive overview of the efficacy of each system. By comparing and contrasting these systems, the review identifies trends and preferences in clinical practice, highlighting the benefits and drawbacks of each approach. The findings indicate that while all systems show promise in enhancing the functionality of mandibular overdentures, patient-specific factors and clinician preferences play crucial roles in the selection process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.