Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40162456›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2024

Innovations in denture marking: Forensic applications and clinical implications: A review.

Ajimol Theresa Jose, Tejaspreet Kaur, Sibani Sarangi, Sania Khan, Shubham Tripathi, Sooriaprakas Chandrasekaran, Ritik Kashwani

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ajimol Theresa JoseDepartment of Prosthodontics & Implantology, AIMST University, Kedah, Malaysia.
Tejaspreet KaurDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics , SKSS dental college, Sarabha, Ludhiana, India.
Sibani SarangiDepartment of Periodontology, Hitech Dental College and Hospital, Bhubaneswar, India.
Sania KhanDepartment of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopedics, District Bhoj Hospital, Dhar, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Shubham TripathiDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, District Bhoj Hospital, Dhar, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Sooriaprakas ChandrasekaranDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Meenakshi Ammal Dental College and Hospital, Meenakshi Academy of Higher Education and Research (Deemed to be University) Chennai.
Ritik KashwaniDepartment of Oral Medicine and Radiology, School of Dental Sciences, Sharda University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Denture marking is a vital tool in forensic odontology and clinical practice, aiding in the identification of dental prostheses, especially in disaster victim identification and cases where traditional methods fail. Techniques are categorized into surface methods like engraving and laser etching and inclusion methods such as embedding RFID tags or barcodes. These markers provide reliable identification, assist in recovering lost prostheses and can be implemented at low cost in routine dental practice. Advancements like RFID technology have made denture marking more efficient and reliable. Overall, denture marking enhances patient safety, reduces redundancy and holds significant medico-legal value.

Indexed as

Denture markersforensicsinclusionrecognitionsurface

Identifiers

PMID40162456
PMCPMC11953542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.