ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery2025
Efficacy of microwave ablation
Article in World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn-depth comparative investigations in terms of clinical efficacies of liver tumor microwave ablation (MWA) and laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH), which are both important treatment modalities for liver neoplasms, have been limited in patients diagnosed with primary small liver cancer (PSLC).
aimTo compare and analyze the clinical efficacy of liver tumor MWA and LH for PSLC.
methodsThis study retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 123 patients with PSLC admitted to Xuzhou Central Hospital from January 2015 to November 2022 and categorized them based on treatment modalities into the LH and MWA groups. The LH group, consisting of 61 cases, received LH, and the MWA group, which included 62 cases, underwent liver tumor MWA. Basic data and various perioperative indicators were compared between the two groups, including changes in liver function indicators [alanine aminotransferase (ALT), glutamic aminotransferase (AST), and total bilirubin (TBIL)] pre- and post-treatment, and efficacy and postoperative complications were analyzed.
resultsNo statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of age, gender, tumor diameter, liver function Child-Pugh classification and number of tumors, body mass index, and educational status (
conclusionMWA is more effective in treating PSLC, and it promotes faster postoperative recovery for patients, and more security improves liver function and reduces postoperative complications compared to LH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.