Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40162368›Full record

ArticleiScience2025

On the uncertainty principle of neural networks.

Jun-Jie Zhang, Dong-Xiao Zhang, Jian-Nan Chen, Long-Gang Pang, Deyu Meng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jun-Jie ZhangNorthwest Institute of Nuclear Technology, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710024, China.
Dong-Xiao ZhangNorthwest Institute of Nuclear Technology, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710024, China.
Jian-Nan ChenNorthwest Institute of Nuclear Technology, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710024, China.
Long-Gang PangKey Laboratory of Quark & Lepton Physics of Ministry of Education, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, Hubei 430079, China.
Deyu MengSchool of Mathematics and Statistics and Ministry of Education Key Lab of Intelligent Networks and Network Security, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710049, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we explore the inherent trade-off between accuracy and robustness in neural networks, drawing an analogy to the uncertainty principle in quantum mechanics. We propose that neural networks are subject to an uncertainty relation, which manifests as a fundamental limitation in their ability to simultaneously achieve high accuracy and robustness against adversarial attacks. Through mathematical proofs and empirical evidence, we demonstrate that this trade-off is a natural consequence of the sharp boundaries formed between different class concepts during training. Our findings reveal that the complementarity principle, a cornerstone of quantum physics, applies to neural networks, imposing fundamental limits on their capabilities in simultaneous learning of conjugate features. Meanwhile, our work suggests that achieving human-level intelligence through a single-network architecture or massive datasets alone may be inherently limited. Our work provides new insights into the theoretical foundations of neural network vulnerability and opens up avenues for designing more robust neural network architectures.

Indexed as

Computer scienceNeural networksPhysics

Identifiers

PMID40162368
PMCPMC11953989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.