ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2025
Utilization of a stabilized hyaluronic acid spacer in SBRT for retroperitoneal cancers: A case series and dosimetric analysis.
Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Protecting organs-at-risk in cancer therapies through temporary organ displacement: a comprehensive review.Oncology reviews · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the clinical indications, post-operative complications, and dosimetric impact of stabilized hyaluronic acid (sHA) spacer insertion in the retroperitoneum for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) of retroperitoneal cancers. Patients and methods: This retrospective study analyzed two cases of SBRT for retroperitoneal lesions: a primary left renal cell carcinoma and an oligometastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) lesion in the right adrenal gland. In both cases, a sHA spacer was percutaneously inserted between the bowel and the lesion. The spacer was placed under laparoscopic and ultrasound guidance for the renal tumor, and under CT guidance for the adrenal lesion. The prescribed dose was 42 Gy in three fractions for the primary renal lesion and 40 Gy in five fractions for the adrenal lesion. Dosimetric parameters were evaluated in two planning scenarios: (1) without the spacer, adhering to OAR constraints, and (2) with the spacer. Results: Spacer insertion for the primary left renal cancer significantly improved PTV D95% from 67.9 % to 99.5 % of the prescribed dose, a 46.5 % increase. PTV D99% increased from 54.5 % to 86.7 %, reflecting a 59.1 % improvement. The large bowel's maximum dose was reduced from 28.2 Gy to 24.4 Gy, and the volume receiving 24 Gy was minimal with the spacer (0.06 cc). For the right oligometastatic adrenal lesion, despite a fourfold increase in tumor volume, post-spacer dosimetry showed improved PTV coverage without exceeding OAR constraints. No post-operative complications were observed in either case. Conclusion: This is the first report on sHA spacer use in the retroperitoneum for SBRT. Spacer insertion near the large bowel significantly improves dosimetry, enabling higher doses to targets while keeping OAR doses within safe limits. Further research with a larger patient population is required to assess safety and for optimization of the technique for spacer placement in order to enhance clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.