Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40162329›Full record

ArticleAdvances in ophthalmology practice and research

Performance of popular large language models in glaucoma patient education: A randomized controlled study.

Yuyu Cao, Wei Lu, Runhan Shi, Fuying Liu, Steven Liu, Xinwei Xu, Jin Yang, Guangyu Rong, Changchang Xin, Xujiao Zhou and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in ophthalmology practice and research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Comparative evaluation of large language models and clinicians in real-world glaucoma clinical reasoning.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Yuyu CaoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Wei LuDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, Shanghai Eye Ear Nose and Throat Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Runhan ShiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Fuying LiuDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, Shanghai Eye Ear Nose and Throat Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Steven LiuDepartment of Statistics, College of Liberal Arts & Sciences, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Champaign, USA.
Xinwei XuFaculty of Business and Economics, Hong Kong University, Hong Kong, China.
Jin YangDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, Shanghai Eye Ear Nose and Throat Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Guangyu RongDepartment of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Changchang XinDepartment of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xujiao ZhouDepartment of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xinghuai SunDepartment of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, Shanghai Eye Ear Nose and Throat Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jiaxu HongDepartment of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The advent of chatbots based on large language models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT, has significantly transformed knowledge acquisition. However, the application of LLMs in glaucoma patient education remains elusive. In this study, we comprehensively compared the performance of four common LLMs - Qwen, Baichuan 2, ChatGPT-4.0, and PaLM 2 - in the context of glaucoma patient education. Methods: Initially, senior ophthalmologists were asked with scoring responses generated by the LLMs, which were answers to the most frequent glaucoma-related questions posed by patients. The Chinese Readability Platform was employed to assess the recommended reading age and reading difficulty score of the four LLMs. Subsequently, optimized models were filtered, and 29 glaucoma patients participated in posing questions to the chatbots and scoring the answers within a real-world clinical setting. Attending ophthalmologists were also required to score the answers across five dimensions: correctness, completeness, readability, helpfulness, and safety. Patients, on the other hand, scored the answers based on three dimensions: satisfaction, readability, and helpfulness. Results: In the first stage, Baichuan 2 and ChatGPT-4.0 outperformed the other two models, though ChatGPT-4.0 had higher recommended reading age and reading difficulty scores. In the second stage, both Baichuan 2 and ChatGPT-4.0 demonstrated exceptional performance among patients and ophthalmologists, with no statistically significant differences observed. Conclusions: Our research identifies Baichuan 2 and ChatGPT-4.0 as prominent LLMs, offering viable options for glaucoma education.

Indexed as

BaichuanChatbotsChatGPTGlaucomaLarge language modelsPaLMPatient educationQwen

Identifiers

PMID40162329
PMCPMC11951182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.