ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Deep Learning Study of Alkaptonuria Spinal Disease Assesses Global and Regional Severity and Detects Occult Treatment Status.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep learning (DL) is increasingly used to analyze medical imaging, but is less refined for rare conditions, which require novel pre-processing and analytical approaches. To assess DL in the context of rare diseases, we focused on alkaptonuria (AKU), a rare disorder that affects the spine and involves other sequelae; treatments include the medication nitisinone. Since assessing X-rays to determine disease severity can be a slow, manual process requiring considerable expertise, we aimed to determine whether our DL methods could accurately identify overall spine severity, severity at specific regions of the spine, and whether DL could detect whether patients were receiving nitisinone. We evaluated DL performance versus clinical experts using cervical and lumbar spine radiographs. DL models predicted global severity scores (30-point scale) within 1.72 ± 1.96 points of expert clinician scores for cervical and 2.51 ± 1.96 points for lumbar radiographs. For region-specific metrics, we assessed the degree of narrowing, calcium, and vacuum phenomena at each intervertebral space (IVS). Our model's narrowing scores were within 0.191-0.557 points from clinician scores (6-point scale), calcium was predicted with 78-90% accuracy (present, absent, or disc fusion), while vacuum disc phenomenon predictions were less consistent (41-90%). Intriguingly, DL models predicted nitisinone treatment status with 68-77% accuracy, while expert clinicians appeared unable to discern nitisinone status (51% accuracy) (p = 2.0 × 10
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.