ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
The association between undetected heteroresistance and antibiotic treatment failure in complicated urinary tract infection.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Antibiotic resistance is a worsening public health threat. One poorly understood aspect of this problem is unexpected antibiotic treatment failure; when an infecting isolate is deemed susceptible to a given antibiotic, yet treatment with that drug fails. It has been proposed that heteroresistance may be an explanation for at least some unexplained treatment failures. Heteroresistance occurs when a bacterial isolate harbors a minor subpopulation of resistant cells which coexists with a majority susceptible population. The clinical relevance of heteroresistance is not clear. Methods: We obtained 291 index isolates from 288 unique patients in the piperacillin/tazobactam arm of the ALLIUM phase 3 clinical trial for the treatment of Gram-negative pathogens causing complicated urinary tract infections. The MIC for all isolates was below the piperacillin/tazobactam resistance breakpoint according to standard antimicrobial susceptibility testing. We performed population analysis profiles on these isolates to detect piperacillin/tazobactam heteroresistance and conducted a post hoc analysis to examine the impact of heteroresistance on clinical outcomes. Findings: We observed that 33/288 (11.5%) of the patients were infected with isolates that were heteroresistant to piperacillin/tazobactam and that patients infected with heteroresistant isolates had an increased rate of treatment failure when compared to patients infected with a non-heteroresistant isolate (odds ratio [OR] 2.13, 95% CI 1.02, 4.41; adjusted OR 1.74, 95% CI 0.82, 3.71). Further, patients without a removable catheter were at particular risk of treatment failure from infection with heteroresistant isolates. Interpretation: These data demonstrate that patients infected with a piperacillin/tazobactam heteroresistant isolate are at an increased risk for piperacillin/tazobactam treatment failure. The results help contextualize commonly observed unexpected antibiotic treatment failure and highlight heteroresistance as a potential cause.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.