ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Risk factors for lung cancer in never-smokers: Multi-cohort study.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: If lung cancer in never-smokers was a single disease entity, it would be the sixth most commonly occurring malignancy. Despite the population impact, its risk factors are poorly understood owing to a dearth of larger-scale, well-characterised studies. Methods: We pooled individual-participant data from 18 prospective cohort studies comprising 91,588 never smokers (55,452 women) aged 16-102 years at study induction. Participants were linked to national death registries. Results: A maximum of 17 years follow-up (mean 9.7) gave rise to 85 lung cancer deaths. Of the 19 potential determinants captured at baseline, only being older age (hazard ratio; 95% confidence interval per 10 year increase: 2.45; 2.11, 2.85), male (2.25; 1.46, 3.48), and having a high fruit and vegetable intake (2.29; 1.25, 4.17) were associated with elevated rates of lung cancer in this never-smoking group. No other substantial relationships were detected. Conclusions: Despite the number and breadth of potential risk factors featured in this multi-cohort study, there was no clear suggestion of new determinants of lung cancer in never-smokers. Impact: Our findings point to the need to explore the influence of risk factors additional to those included herein, particular in the field of genetics. Our unlikely finding for fruit and vegetable consumption warrants further testing.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.