ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Objective Sleep Quality in Diverse Older Adults: the Importance of Race and Ethnicity and Sex.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Research on sleep disparities across different sociodemographic groups is limited and often yields inconsistent findings. We aimed to examine differences in objective sleep measures by race and ethnicity, sex, and age within a diverse cohort of community-dwelling older adults. Methods: We analyzed cross-sectional data from 838 participants aged ≥50 years in the Dormir Study (2020-2024). Sleep metrics, including sleep duration, sleep efficiency, wake after sleep onset (WASO), and sleep fragmentation index (SFI), were derived from 7-day wrist actigraphy. Race and ethnicity (Black; Mexican American [MA]; Non-Hispanic White [NHW]), sex, and age (<65; ≥65 years) were self-reported. We compared sleep metrics across sociodemographic groups and assessed their multivariable associations using linear, logistic, and multinomial regression models. Results: We studied 190 (22.7%) Black, 282 (33.6%) MA, and 366 (43.7%) NHW Dormir participants, with a mean age of 66.7 ±8.4 years, and 64.8% women. Compared to NHW participants, Black and MA participants had shorter mean sleep duration (Black: 7.1 ±1.2 hours; MA: 7.1 ±1.1 hours; NHW: 7.5 ±1.1 hours; p<0.0001), lower median sleep efficiency (Black: 87.2%; MA: 87.8%; NHW: 90.6%; p<0.0001), longer median WASO (Black: 61.2 minutes; MA: 56.7 minutes; NHW: 44.4 minutes; p<0.0001), and higher mean SFI (Black: 32.0 ±11.0%; MA: 27.3 ±9.7%; NHW: 24.0 ±9.0%; p<0.0001). Compared to men, women had longer mean sleep duration (women: 7.4 ±1.1 hours; men: 7.1 ±1.2 hours; p=0.0004) and lower mean SFI (women: 25.9 ±8.8%; men: 28.9 ±12.1%; p=0.0001). Older participants had longer mean sleep duration (old: 7.4 ±1.1 hours; young: 7.1 ±1.1 hours; p<0.0001), higher median sleep efficiency (old: 89.8%; young: 87.7%; p<0.0001), shorter median WASO (old: 48.5 minutes; young: 56.8 minutes; p<0.0001), and lower mean SFI (old: 26.1 ±10.2%; young: 28.1 ±10.2%; p=0.007). After adjusting for socioeconomic and behavioral factors, comorbidities, and sleep medications, findings were consistent except for age group comparisons in which differences were no longer significant. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate significant variations in objective sleep measures across sociodemographic groups, with non-White participants and men experiencing poorer sleep quality. These disparities may contribute to health inequalities, emphasizing the need for targeted interventions to support at-risk populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.