ArticleResearch square2025
The Significance of the WHO/ISH Absolute Cardiovascular Risk Prediction Scores among Recent Stroke Survivors in Ghana-Insights from the PINGS2 multicenter study.
Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04404166 (Phone-based Intervention Under Nurse Guidance After Stroke 2), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Phone-based Intervention Under Nurse Guidance After Stroke 2
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The leading cause of stroke remains atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. The World Health Organization/International Society of Hypertension risk score represents an effort to produce a risk assessment tool for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease that is regionally specific. No previous work has described absolute cardiovascular risk scores among recent stroke survivors in West Africa via this tool. Methods: A cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from the multicenter, phase III randomized, open-label, clinical trial, Phone-based Intervention under Nurse Guidance II (PINGS-2), was performed. Data from 414 participants who had recently survived a stroke and met the age range compatible with the risk estimation tool were analyzed. The WHO/ISH score was calculated for each participant and categorized into low, moderate, and high/very high CVD risk scores. Demographic data, medical histories, anthropometry, vascular risk profiles, stroke types and severity indices were compared across CVD risk categories. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to further examine variables significantly associated with WHO/ISH CVD risk via univariate analysis. Results: The mean age of the study population was 58 years (SD = 12), with the majority being male (56.5%). Ischemic strokes (n = 263, 74.3%) were more common than hemorrhagic strokes (n = 78, 22%). Over two-thirds (76.3%) of the participants were estimated to have a low (< 10%) risk of cardiovascular disease in the next 10 years, 14.5% were estimated to have a moderate risk, and only 9.2% were stratified as high or very high risk. The absolute CVD risk score was significantly associated with age, higher income, tobacco use, systolic blood pressure and HBA1c. There was no significant difference in absolute cardiovascular risk by stroke type. Conclusion: A comparatively lower proportion of Ghanaian stroke survivors were classified as high risk by the WHO/ISH risk score. This raises the question of its appropriateness as a cardiovascular risk assessment tool to drive secondary prevention among this patient population. Trial registration: NCT04404166. Registered on May 27,2020 at ClinicalTrials.gov.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.