Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40162175›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Machine learning-driven prediction of hospital admissions using gradient boosting and GPT-2.

Xingyu Zhang, Hairong Wang, Guan Yu, Wenbin Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xingyu ZhangDepartment of Communication Science and Disorders, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8108-1997
Hairong WangCollege of Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Guan YuDepartment of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Wenbin ZhangKnight Foundation School of Computing & Information Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Accurately predicting hospital admissions from the emergency department (ED) is essential for improving patient care and resource allocation. This study aimed to predict hospital admissions by integrating both structured clinical data and unstructured text data using machine learning models. Methods: Data were obtained from the 2021 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey-Emergency Department (NHAMCS-ED), including adult patients aged 18 years and older. Structured data included demographics, visit characteristics, vital signs, and medical history, while unstructured data consisted of free-text chief complaints and injury descriptions. A Gradient Boosting Classifier (GBC) was applied to structured data, while a fine-tuned GPT-2 model processed the unstructured text. A combined model was created by averaging the outputs of both models. Model performance was evaluated using 5-fold cross-validation, assessing accuracy, precision, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC). Results: Among the 13,115 patients, 2264 (17.3%) were admitted to the hospital. The combined model outperformed the individual structured and unstructured models, achieving an accuracy of 75.8%, precision of 39.5%, sensitivity of 75.8%, and specificity of 75.8%. In comparison, the structured data model achieved 73.8% accuracy, while the unstructured model reached 64.6%. The combined model had the highest AUC, indicating superior performance. Conclusions: Combining structured and unstructured data using machine learning significantly improves the prediction of hospital admissions from the ED. This integrated approach can enhance decision-making and optimize ED operations.

Indexed as

emergency departmentHospital admission predictionmachine learningnatural language processing

Identifiers

PMID40162175
PMCPMC11951900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.