ArticleDigital health
Machine learning-driven prediction of hospital admissions using gradient boosting and GPT-2.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing the effect of race on machine learning models predicting hospital admissions from emergency department.JAMIA open · 2026Article
- Machine Learning for Personalized Prediction of Electrocardiogram (EKG) Use in Emergency Care.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Accurately predicting hospital admissions from the emergency department (ED) is essential for improving patient care and resource allocation. This study aimed to predict hospital admissions by integrating both structured clinical data and unstructured text data using machine learning models. Methods: Data were obtained from the 2021 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey-Emergency Department (NHAMCS-ED), including adult patients aged 18 years and older. Structured data included demographics, visit characteristics, vital signs, and medical history, while unstructured data consisted of free-text chief complaints and injury descriptions. A Gradient Boosting Classifier (GBC) was applied to structured data, while a fine-tuned GPT-2 model processed the unstructured text. A combined model was created by averaging the outputs of both models. Model performance was evaluated using 5-fold cross-validation, assessing accuracy, precision, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC). Results: Among the 13,115 patients, 2264 (17.3%) were admitted to the hospital. The combined model outperformed the individual structured and unstructured models, achieving an accuracy of 75.8%, precision of 39.5%, sensitivity of 75.8%, and specificity of 75.8%. In comparison, the structured data model achieved 73.8% accuracy, while the unstructured model reached 64.6%. The combined model had the highest AUC, indicating superior performance. Conclusions: Combining structured and unstructured data using machine learning significantly improves the prediction of hospital admissions from the ED. This integrated approach can enhance decision-making and optimize ED operations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.