ArticleDigital health
Identifying behaviour change techniques, technical features and implementation options for a virtual reality intervention to motivate adult smokers to quit: A focus group study with healthcare and virtual reality experts.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: In this study, individuals working in healthcare or virtual reality (VR) were invited to contribute towards developing a VR intervention to encourage adults to quit smoking, by building upon user-generated ideas from a previous co-design study with adult smokers. Methods: Three online focus groups were with healthcare workers ( Results: In the first theme, experts agreed that previous co-design content showing the outcomes of quitting or not quitting could be helpful. Suggested behaviour change techniques included 'prompt comparative imagining of future outcomes', and 'imaginary reward'. Experts suggested a format where users could customise an avatar and select what content they see, creating a tailored narrative. There was a subtheme about the potential unsuitability of co-design content based on extreme fear appeals, which experts thought could trigger fatalism or defensiveness. The second theme covers considerations to make VR safe and inclusive. For example, making the experience seated for those with limited mobility, hygiene protocols and a screening process to exclude smokers at risk of harm (individuals with frailty, photosensitive epilepsy or a serious mental health condition). The last theme outlines the benefits and potential barriers of implementing VR with the 'ask, advise, act' model for smoking cessation used in healthcare contexts. Conclusion: Findings suggest that VR has the potential to deliver embodied, interactive and customisable smoking cessation messages, rooted in behavioural theory. The suggestions will inform the development of a prototype which will subsequently be evaluated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.