Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40162161›Full record

ReviewDigital health

Effectiveness of telerehabilitation on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health framework outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Jenjira Thanakamchokchai, Fuengfa Khobkhun, Ruttana Phetsitong, Pakaratee Chaiyawat, Kantheera Areerak, Kanjana Niemrungruang, Jarugool Tretriluxana

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jenjira ThanakamchokchaiFaculty of Physical Therapy, Mahidol University, Salaya, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1581-5790
Fuengfa KhobkhunFaculty of Physical Therapy, Mahidol University, Salaya, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9662-5643
Ruttana PhetsitongFaculty of Physical Therapy, Mahidol University, Salaya, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2442-4804
Pakaratee ChaiyawatFaculty of Physical Therapy, Mahidol University, Salaya, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2647-3116
Kantheera AreerakFaculty of Physical Therapy, Mahidol University, Salaya, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4329-3355
Kanjana NiemrungruangPhysical Therapy Center, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Jarugool TretriluxanaMotor Control and Neural Plasticity Laboratory, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Mahidol University, Salaya, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5303-8569

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to synthesize and analyze the evidence on the effectiveness of telerehabilitation categorized according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) outcomes for physical therapy (PT) during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Methods: Studies were identified using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), Scopus, PubMed, EMBASE, and other sources of data. Randomized controlled trials comparing telerehabilitation with the control group (i.e., no treatment/usual care) were included. Standard meta-analysis techniques were applied to assess the effectiveness of telerehabilitation. Outcome measures were categorized according to the domains of the ICF. Results: Among the 134 studies that met the eligibility criteria, the majority of findings demonstrated significant improvements across all domains of the ICF following telerehabilitation as compared to the control group, regardless of participant groups. Only 9 of 134 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Six studies enrolled individuals with COVID-19 and the remaining three enrolled individuals with knee osteoarthritis (OA) who were unable to access services at the clinic. Compared with the control group, the Borg-Rating-of-Perceived-Exertion scale, as reflected in an impairment domain, was significantly lower in individuals with COVID-19 who received telerehabilitation (3 studies, Conclusion: This study provides evidence supporting the effectiveness of telerehabilitation across all domains of the ICF, with significant improvements observed in the impairment and activity domains for individuals with COVID-19. These improvements are particularly evident in the meta-analysis findings such as perceived exertion, leg strength, and functional capacity.

Indexed as

COVID-19physical therapyrehabilitationsystematic review and meta-analysistelerehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID40162161
PMCPMC11951915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.