Bark anatomy of

Kolwane Calphonia Shilaluke, Annah Moteetee, Alexei Oskolski

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in AoB PLANTS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kolwane Calphonia ShilalukeDepartment of Botany and Plant Biotechnology, University of Johannesburg, P.O Box 524, Auckland Park, 2006 Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3121-4469

Annah MoteeteeDepartment of Botany and Plant Biotechnology, University of Johannesburg, P.O Box 524, Auckland Park, 2006 Johannesburg, South Africa.

Alexei OskolskiDepartment of Botany and Plant Biotechnology, University of Johannesburg, P.O Box 524, Auckland Park, 2006 Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6205-8492

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The covering tissue structure is important for leafless stem succulents, influencing their photosynthetic activity. Usually, the epidermis on succulent stems persists for a long time, making the stem photosynthesize as long as possible. Its persistence implies maintaining the continuity of covering tissues during bark dilatation. In most plants, dilatation is performed by developing periderm(s) to replace the epidermis. The ways of bark dilatation with delay of periderm formation remain poorly known. In the present study, we examine the structure of the juvenile and mature bark of succulent pencil tree

Indexed as

expansion cracksfibre-sclereidsperidermphellogen initiationphotosynthesisstomatastomatal grooves

Identifiers

PMID40162134

DOI10.1093/aobpla/plaf007

PMCPMC11954586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.