Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40162059›Full record

ReviewToxicon: X2025

Epidemiological and geodemographic patterns of scorpionism in Ecuador: A nationwide analysis (2021-2024).

Jorge Vasconez-Gonzalez, Juan S Izquierdo-Condoy, Camila Miño, María de Lourdes Noboa-Lasso, Esteban Ortiz-Prado

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Toxicon: X, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jorge Vasconez-GonzalezOne Health Research Group, Faculty of Health Science, Universidad de Las Americas, Quito, Ecuador.
Juan S Izquierdo-CondoyOne Health Research Group, Faculty of Health Science, Universidad de Las Americas, Quito, Ecuador.
Camila MiñoOne Health Research Group, Faculty of Health Science, Universidad de Las Americas, Quito, Ecuador.
María de Lourdes Noboa-LassoProgram in Occupational Safety and Health, The University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Esteban Ortiz-PradoOne Health Research Group, Faculty of Health Science, Universidad de Las Americas, Quito, Ecuador.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Approximately 1.2 million scorpion stings are reported globally each year, resulting in an estimated 3000 deaths. Of the 2500 known scorpion species, about 40 are considered medically significant. In Ecuador, where at least 47 scorpion species exist, information on scorpion stings remains scarce. Methods: A nationwide cross-sectional analysis was conducted on all officially reported cases of scorpion stings documented in the epidemiological surveillance reports from the Ministry of Public Health in Ecuador between 2021 and 2024. Results: A total of 1633 cases were identified, with women accounting for 52% of cases (n = 849). The highest incidence was observed among children aged one to four years old, with rates of 18.16 and 19.11 per 100,000 inhabitants for males and females, respectively. Geographically, the Amazon region was the most affected, with the province of Morona Santiago reporting the highest incidence at 284.14 cases per 100,000 inhabitants. Conclusion: Scorpion stings represent a significant and underreported public health threat in Ecuador. This study highlights the considerable disease burden, particularly in specific regions of the country, and underscores the urgent need for targeted public health interventions and policy changes, including the local production of antivenoms.

Indexed as

EcuadorEpidemiologyPublic healthScorpion envenomationScorpion sting

Identifiers

PMID40162059
PMCPMC11951006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.