ArticleInternational journal of integrated care
"I Could Stop and Breathe": Early Implementation Results of a Short-Term Care Coordination Model for Children with Medical Complexity.
Article in International journal of integrated care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Children with medical complexity (CMC) are a vulnerable population with high healthcare utilisation and significant care coordination challenges. This study evaluates the early implementation results of a short-term Care Coordination Model designed to address these challenges within the Hunter New England Local Health District (HNELHD) in New South Wales, Australia. The Model aims to provide an intensive, time-limited "dose" of care coordination, followed by a Maintenance Phase, to improve healthcare use and reduce the coordination burden on families and healthcare staff. Description: The Model consists of two phases; an Intensive Phase led by a Paediatric Care Coordinator, providing focused support and care planning for 6-12 months, and a Maintenance Phase where care is handed over to a member of a Paediatric Care Coordination Network for ongoing monitoring and support. A pre-post evaluation of hospital utilisation data for the first 20 children enrolled in the Model was conducted, covering six months before and six months after enrolment. Outcomes measured included outpatient appointments, coordinated appointments, inpatient stays, emergency department presentations, and travel distance for care. Discussion: The early results from the pilot phase indicate promising outcomes. The Intensive Phase of the Model has led to more coordinated appointments, and reduced travel for families. The concept of "coordination respite" emerged as a significant benefit, where families experienced relief from the constant pressures of managing their child's care. This respite allowed families to regroup, organise, and find the mental space to learn how to better coordinate their child's care independently. The Intensive Phase provides critical support during the most demanding times, while the Maintenance Phase is positioned to support sustained, long-term assistance. Conclusion: The early implementation of the short-term Care Coordination Model for CMC in HNELHD shows significant potential. The Model's intensive, time-limited approach, combined with a Maintenance Phase and a strong focus on family empowerment and Network collaboration, offers a sustainable approach to care coordination. Future research should continue to explore the optimal dose of care coordination that is aligned with the principles of value-based care and further evaluate the Model's long-term impact, beyond the Intensive Phase.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.