Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40162027›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of integrated care

Health Justice Partnership: An Opportunity to Respond to Childhood Adversity.

Sarah Loveday, Suzie Forell, Rebecca Bosward, Lingling Chen, Leanne N Constable, Wilhelmina Ebbett, Ashraful Kabir, Hueiming Liu, Alexandra Preddy, Natalie White and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of integrated care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sarah LovedayDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6512-8900
Suzie ForellHealth Justice Australia, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1453-5669
Rebecca BoswardSydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3368-0781
Lingling ChenHealth Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3435-1282
Leanne N ConstableHealth Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5692-8882
Wilhelmina EbbettSydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Ashraful KabirHealth Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6851-1507
Hueiming LiuThe George Institute for Global Health, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9077-8673
Alexandra PreddySydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Natalie WhiteCentre for Community Child Health, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6164-9038
Harriet HiscockDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3017-2770

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Health justice partnerships (HJP) embed legal support into health care teams to address patient unmet legal needs. Families experiencing adversity are likely to have multiple legal needs yet are unlikely to seek legal assistance. Implementing a HJP within an integrated health and social care hub may improve outcomes for families by addressing adversity related to unmet legal need. Methods: A mixed-method evaluation of new HJPs was conducted across two sites in Australia. Process data were collected regarding the use of the legal services. Qualitative data explored the experience of legal support. Results: Forty caregivers were referred across two sites with 38 seen over the first 12 months. Caregivers had an average 2.5 legal issues each; 65% of referrals were for family violence and family law matters, 31% were for civil law matters and 4% were for criminal matters. Qualitative data demonstrated the value of HJP to increase practitioner confidence and understanding of legal support pathways while empowering caregivers to access legal support. Conclusions: These HJPs improved access to legal support for families experiencing adversity and enabled early intervention. Improved outcomes from HJP depends upon the level of investment from each partner and the level of assistance the HJP can provide.

Indexed as

childhood adversitycommunityhealth justice partnershipintegrated care

Identifiers

PMID40162027
PMCPMC11951959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.