ArticleInternational journal of integrated care
Provider, Caregiver, and Patient Experiences of an Integrated Care Program for Older Adults Designated as Alternate Level of Care: A Qualitative Case Study.
Article in International journal of integrated care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Acute Practitioners' Experiences of Implementing Frailty Same Day Emergency Care: A Researcher-in-Residence Study.International journal of integrated careArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Following hospitalization, older adults with complex health and social care needs are often deemed to need an "alternate level of care" (ALC) where care needs are misaligned with resources. Coordinated networks can implement integrated care programs for this group in home settings. Understanding the experiences of providers, caregivers, and patients will inform ongoing implementation efforts. Methods: A qualitative case study was undertaken of North York Community Access to Resources Enabling Support (NYCARES), a novel integrated care program implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic. Data collection consisted of semi-structured interviews, document analysis, and observational field notes; data were thematically analyzed. Results: Thirty-six providers, caregivers, and patients were interviewed. Three themes were developed: 1) NYCARES as a lifeline; 2) Experiences tempered by expectations and connection; and 3) The role of integrated care. Discussion: The NYCARES program was seen as valuable, but implementation posed challenges for each participant group due to varying expectations and perceived degree of connection between patients, families, and providers. Conclusions: The local coordinated network successfully implemented the NYCARES program for ALC patients despite challenges in stakeholder connections. Similar programs should formally support caregivers and forefront multidirectional communication, particularly between providers in different implementation roles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.