ArticleInternational journal of integrated care
Managing Institutional Diversity in Integrated Care: A Systematic Literature Review of Institutional Logics and Management Strategies.
Article in International journal of integrated care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tensions in patient involvement and engagement in health research and development: a qualitative interview study with key actors.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- Competing institutional logics in surgical training: a qualitative study of coping strategies in China's dual-track system.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This review examines the institutional diversity in integrated care due to various institutional logics and explores the essential management strategies for navigating this diversity effectively. Methods: This systematic literature review involved a comprehensive search across Scopus, Medline and Google Scholar. This process identified 1747 articles, with rigorous screening narrowing them down to eight key articles. Results: The study unveils five primary institutional logics in integrated care, focusing on their unique characteristics and how they interrelate, and highlights crucial management strategies for maintaining a balance among these diverse logics. Discussion: Applying the institutional logic perspective, this study uncovers the complex interplay of diverse logics shaping integrated care-a previously underexamined facet. Examining the foundational beliefs underlying organizational behaviour offers deeper insights into institutional complexities often overlooked in previous literature. This highlights the necessity for effective management strategies to reconcile conflicting logics, promoting more sustainable integrated care solutions. Conclusion: The review comprehensively explores institutional logics in integrated care, emphasizing the importance of holistic management strategies. It highlights the imperative for policymakers and healthcare administrators to balance operational efficiency, patient-focused care, and professional independence-essential elements in crafting successful integrated care frameworks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.